Allan McRae

This is what happens if you ignore a weed growing on your lawn for a while. It grew to over four metres and had thorns all along the stem. In an effort to convince me that I should remove it, my wife found out that it is a Giant Devil’s Fig, which is classified as a “Noxious weed” in Brisbane. After much nagging, I chopped it down before the native bats could eat its fruit and spread it further.

And yes, my lawnmower is missing a front wheel…

A while back, I wrote about using an x86_64 kernel on an i686 userland. After using this setup for a while, I began to discover that it is not that user friendly to have to use linux32 in front many commands. In particular, when building software the ./configure needs to be prefixed with it and bash can not handle creating an alias to transparently do that. Also, I would need to make aliases for all build tools I could encounter (make, cmake, qmake, …), which is almost an impossible task.

In true Baldrick style, I came up with a cunning plan… What if I called my shell with a linux32 prefix and then my system would think it was always an i686 one. I only need my system to think it is an x86_64 when I enter an x86_64 chroot, so that is much easier to create aliases to deal with. The trick was to create a /bin/bash32 file containing:

#!/bin/bash
linux32 /bin/bash -l "$@"

Then add bash32 to the list of shells in /etc/shells and use “chsh -s bash32” to start using it.

After using this setup for several weeks, the only issue I notice is that when using chroot, it will look for /bin/bash32 in the chroot and likely fail. That can be fixed by prefixing with the SHELL environmental variable pointing at an appropriate shell (more than likely /bin/bash). I am sure that creating a wrapper script to handle that would be easy but using chroots via the Arch devtools does not suffer from this problem so I have not looked into it further.

The Chakra Project is a “distrolet” based on Arch Linux and providing its own KDE packages (collectively called KDEmod). I really do not like KDE so I am only interested in how the install goes. I used QEMU with a 4GB image and 512MB RAM with the 2010-01-10 “Aesop” installer.

The installer is live CD based, so boots you into a nice looking desktop [01]. Starting the installation takes you to a graphical install system [02] with the prerequisite warning about being an alpha release and the issues it can cause your hamster. After reading some notes and agreeing to various EULAs [03], the install is all go.

Onto the preparation of your system. The language and time settings looked quite ugly [04], but I have suspicions that QEMU was running this quite slow and maybe this was an artefact. I found it good to know that despite the complexities of installing being hidden, there was options to go in deeper [05] if needed. Partitioning [06] was not particularly simple, but that is being reworked for the future.

The actual installation of packages [07] proceeds with a montage of screenshot to whet your appetite for your new install. Of course you probably have already seen what it looks like from the live CD… Then you create some new users [08] (although I do not know what exactly an “Administrator” is), enter the root password and install the bootloader. I have no idea what the “Configure System” item at the end of the installer sidebar does as after installing the bootloader I got a reboot dialog.

The booting system looks familiar [09] to any Arch Linux user. I had expected a graphical boot-up as I had heard something about it using Plymouth, but I guess that is for the future. The login screen indicates that the /etc/hosts file has issues with setting the hostname [10]. Other than that, I was left with a fully working KDE desktop with no obvious issues. Looking at some configuration files to see how well the automatic set-up went found some interesting points. The MODULES array in /etc/rc.conf both disables and enables the e1000 module [11]. Also, I noticed that kdm is started as a daemon rather than using the inittab method, which I guess is more in line with what Chakra wants to provide but I find that to be less flexible. The supplied pacman.conf has the repos listed in an interesting order [12] (I think [core] should at least come before the KDEmod repos).

Overall, the installer does its job despite a few rough edges. The install booted to the desktop with relatively few configuration issues that I could spot. Not bad for something labelled “alpha”. Is it the “Arch made easy” that is often touted on Distrowatch Weekly comments? Maybe. But with a distro like Arch, that is not necessarily a good thing.

Screenshot index:

[01] – Live CD Desktop
[02] – Installer start screen
[03] – EULAs
[04] – Language and timezone setup
[05] – Hidden “advanced” options
[06] – Partitioning
[07] – Package installation
[08] – User creation
[09] – Bootup
[10] – Login
[11] – /etc/rc.conf
[12] – /etc/pacman.conf

Many Arch Linux users are hitting issues with the updates for libpng and libjpeg. This update required us to rebuild about 15% of our packages so the mirrors are struggling to sync. I’d recommend waiting for a day or two, or finding an up-to-date mirror. Also, this update will require you to rebuild any packages from the AUR or unofficial repos that link to those libraries. If you run into issues:

• Check the problem package is up to date (using the package search on the Arch Linux web-site)
• Check the binary files in the package using readelf -d file. If that does not show libpng12.so.0 or libjpeg.so.7, that package is not the problem.
• Try finding the problem package using the lddd script from the devtools package.
• If you are certain this is because of a package in the Arch Linux repos, file a bug report.

Or you could just ignore all that and rebuild cairo-lcd as that is probably your issue…